In accord with AOS-SACC (Proposals 780 and 781) and AOS-NACC (Chesser et al. 2020b), the sequence of hummingbirds in the group previously listed between Chlorostilbon and Hylocharis is revised, based primarily on McGuire et al. (2014) and Hernández-Baños et al. (2020). In accord with AOS-SACC (Proposal 781), change the scientific name of Glittering-throated Emerald from Amazilia fimbriata to Chionomesa fimbriata (Stiles et al. 2017a, b), based on genetic evidence that the traditional genus Amazilia is not monophyletic (McGuire et al. 2014).
Clements, J. F., T. S. Schulenberg, M. J. Iliff, S. M. Billerman, T. A. Fredericks, J. A. Gerbracht, D. Lepage, B. L. Sullivan, and C. L. Wood. 2021. The eBird/Clements checklist of Birds of the World: v2021. Downloaded from https://www.birds.cornell.edu/clementschecklist/download/ (Vínculo)
Because Amazilia hasn't been split in this case, there are now false disagreements between Amazilia sp. and this species (e.g., https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/31109192). Should this not have been done using a split of the genus? I realise it's a big genus and a complex split with lots of children, so maybe not feasible or desirable, but doing this swap without a split has also caused undesirable results. Any thoughts?
Los desacuerdos no intencionados ocurren cuando un grupo padre (B) se adelgaza al cambiar un grupo hijo (E) a otra parte del árbol taxonómico, provocando que las Identificaciones existentes del grupo padre sean interpretados como desacuerdos con las Identificaciones existentes del grupo hijo cambiado.
Identification
La ID 2 del taxón E será un desacuerdo no intencionado con la ID 1 del taxón B después del intercambio de ancestros
Si el adelgazamiento del grupo padre provoca más de 10 desacuerdos no intencionados, deberías dividir el grupo padre después de intercambiar el grupo hijo para substituir las identificaciones existentes del grupo padre (B) con identificaciones con las que no esté en desacuerdo,
Because Amazilia hasn't been split in this case, there are now false disagreements between Amazilia sp. and this species (e.g., https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/31109192). Should this not have been done using a split of the genus? I realise it's a big genus and a complex split with lots of children, so maybe not feasible or desirable, but doing this swap without a split has also caused undesirable results. Any thoughts?