Taxonomic Swap 18493
(Guardado el 25/09/2020)
|
|
Reemplazado con |
|
Comentarios
I am actually quite confused about the current status of Gymnopus/Marasmius/Micromphale/Mycetinis.
@else will likely be more informed about it, but I can ask Dennis Desjardin (certainly among the most experienced taxonomists on this group) when I see him later this month.
the paper by Mata et al. 2007 shows that the M. androsaceus group falls within Gymnopus, and that is the present opinion on this group. And yes, Marasmius and Gymnopus quercophilus refer to the same species.
Looks like this has been hanging out for over 3 years? What needs to be done to make this happen and be done?
A curator needs to click the "Commit" button, but I'm hesitant to do so b/c I don't know anything about mushroom taxonomy and don't know if things have changed in the last three years. If @else or @leptonia think this is still the right move, I'm happy to click the button and suffer the consequences.
I regret to inform @kueda @douglassmith @else and myself that things most certainly have changed:
http://www.speciesfungorum.org/Names/SynSpecies.asp?RecordID=828588
https://ppbio.inpa.gov.br/sites/default/files/Oliveira_J_J_S_et_al_2019_Mycological_Progress_0.pdf so, is this paper a safe one to use to modernize our tree?
@jameskm yes, I think that's the one – also, I think mining http://agaric.us/ would probably be productive to update some of our taxonomy.
Ok, so we should move both these names to: Marasmiellus quercophilus? And when can that happen?
@douglassmith it's all volunteer run here. I don't like to do single names out of a publication piecemeal (although I'm not strictly above it). In this case (that paper) there's lots of names that should change at the same time.
Thankfully if you use one of the old names, whenever the taxon swap gets committed, you'll be automatically notified with an option to update your observations.
edit: Looks like @jameskm did it already!
Does that mean this one should be deleted outright? It's kind of nice to keep this discussion around if we can just sort of de-stage or nullify it.
I haven't comitted it, just drafted it. We could copy the comments onto something else? Not quite the same, though.
Instead of making a new one you could just edit this one. Or we could add some kind of "cancelled" status to taxon changes that prevents them from being edited or committed.
I have never been able to successfully edit a swap into a merge. Could just do two swaps I guess.
Alright, I think I have incorporated that paper as much as I can. There are still a bunch of species in Gymnopus and Marasmiellus that I am not sure are in the right place.
Awesome, thanks very much @jameskm
@leptonia and @else, does this look right to you?