Atención: Algunas o todas las identificaciones afectadas por
esta división puede haber sido reemplazada por identificaciones de 
Caesalpinieae. Esto
ocurre cuando no podemos asignar automáticamente una identificación a uno de los
taxa de salida.
Revisar identificaciones de Caesalpinia 48315
Caesalpinieae. Esto
ocurre cuando no podemos asignar automáticamente una identificación a uno de los
taxa de salida.
Revisar identificaciones de Caesalpinia 48315
Taxonomic Split 74467
(Guardado el 05/04/2020)
|
|
dividido en |
|
Comentarios
I'll take a crack at the Arizona observations. Most of them appear to be commonly cultivated species in urban areas.
Edit: Well, that was easy - there were only seven for the state. I think I can branch out a little.
ha - thanks!
It looks like this split is slow to go through, so some more changes might be added over the next few hours.
I will check mexican species
Hi @bouteloua , I can take a look at the species of the Yucatan Peninsula.
Awesome, there were around 450 observations at rank tribe last time I checked and now we're down to 341. ☺
Agregar un comentario
Acceder
o Crear una cuenta
para agregar comentarios.
@ tagging some top identifiers who may be able to help refine these observations that are currently at rank=tribe for Caesalpinieae:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/identify?reviewed=any&taxon_id=747312&lrank=tribe
@pioleon @jeanphilippeb @francisco3_tutor @blakesito @adorantes @ripleyrm @stevejones @najera_tutor @cwbarrows @susanmf @alexiz