Taxon merge aaaaaa 48px Taxonomic Merge 75543 (Guardado el 13/06/2020)

https://www.inaturalist.org/flags/354352
POWO no longer recognizes subspecies for this taxon. In addition, it lists H. cretica as a synonym.

POWO (Referencia)
Añadido por stevejones el 28 de abril de 2020 | Comprometido por stevejones el 13 de junio de 2020
combinado en

Comentarios

Thumb

Do not commit before review by @aztekium @savvaszafeiriou @matt_g. @smfang (flag here) @bouteloua (flag here) as well.

Publicado por stevejones hace 7 meses (Marca)
Thumb

Ιn Greece present
1, Hedypnois rhagadioloides (L.) F.W. Schmidt subsp. rhagadioloides
Synonymy:
=Hedypnois cretica (L.) Dum. Cours.
=Hedypnois cretica subsp. rhagadioloides (L.) Arcang.
=Hedypnois pendula Willd.
=Hedypnois rhagadioloides subsp. cretica (L.) Hayek
=Hedypnois rhagadioloides subsp. monspeliensis Nyman

2, Hedypnois rhagadioloides subsp. tubaeformis (Ten.) Hayek
Synonymy
=Hedypnois cretica subsp. tubaeformis (Ten.) Nyman
=Leontodon rhagadioloides subsp. tubaeformis (Ten.) Enke & Zidorn

Publicado por aztekium hace 7 meses (Marca)
Thumb

Thanks, Stavros. Based on that we should abandon this taxon merge and instead perform a taxon swap of H. cretica to H. rhagadioloides. I'll await further comments.

Publicado por stevejones hace 7 meses (Marca)
Thumb

i agree wih the swap of H. cretica to H. rhagadioloides.

Publicado por aztekium hace 7 meses (Marca)
Thumb

Oh, hell. I neglected to review the comments here before committing. It appears I should have removed the subspecies and simply changed H. cretica to H. rhagadioloides. My apologies, Stavros, for not reading through these comments again before committing. While this does conform to POWO, the information you posted here contradicts that. If you think it important I can add those subspecific designations back for the eight observations with subspecific designations.

Publicado por stevejones hace 5 meses (Marca)
Thumb

I think we are OK being in conformance with POWO on this one for now. Quoting from http://cichorieae.e-taxonomy.net/portal/cdm_dataportal/taxon/c00984a1-81b9-48da-a481-214e1dcee5a3

"Recognition of infraspecific entities, usually at the rank of subspecies and mainly based on the diameter of the peduncle at fruit, is probably not justified. As has been exemplified with an analysis of the plants on Corse by Jeanmonod & Schlüssel (2012), the peduncle diameter seems to vary gradually, without discontinuity and geographical pattern."

If someone still wants to propose a deviation for any infraspecific taxa, they are always welcome to flag for it.

Publicado por jdmore hace 5 meses (Marca)
Thumb

Good point, Jim, and thanks, but I still feel foolish.

Publicado por stevejones hace 5 meses (Marca)

Agregar un comentario

Acceder o Crear una cuenta para agregar comentarios.