Taxonomic Swap 102510 (Guardado el 19/09/2022)

"Listed as separate species by Johnson & Golsliner (2012) but these authors did not sample or examine any specimen. For this reason the subspecific rank hitherto accepted under Hypselodoris picta is now conserved under Felimare picta" but I'm not seeing their mention of azorica anywhere.
https://www.molluscabase.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=597522

Añadido por thomaseverest el diciembre 6, 2021 04:30 MAÑANA | Comprometido por thomaseverest el 19 de septiembre de 2022
Reemplazado con

Comentarios

@jpsilva thoughts?

Publicado por thomaseverest hace más de 2 años

@thomaseverest I don't see the rationale behind the unacceptance of this subspecies by WoRMS citing a reference which did not use material from this population. There is however another reference which proposes this unacceptance: Almada F., Levy A. & Robalo J.I. (2016). Not so sluggish: the success of Felimare picta complex (Gastropoda, Nudibranchia) crossing Atlantic biogeographic barriers. PeerJ. 4: e1561 (https://peerj.com/articles/1561/). But this conclusion is apt for discussion: I'd like to see a Felimare picta from the Azores with the more typical patterns found elsewhere. Likewise I'd like to see the distinctive patterns of F. picta azorica elsewhere. DNA shows it's not a different species but this population is clearly distinctive.
Bottom line: I'd like to see further work done with this population but for now we should follow WoRMS even though its argument is not correct.

Publicado por jpsilva hace más de 2 años

Well we can also deviate and keep it as a subspecies it that's what the community would like. Ideally if the literature points the other way we'd go with MB. But feel free to commit the swap.

Publicado por thomaseverest hace más de 2 años

Agregar un comentario

Acceder o Crear una cuenta para agregar comentarios.