Clements, J. F., T. S. Schulenberg, M. J. Iliff, S. M. Billerman, T. A. Fredericks, J. A. Gerbracht, D. Lepage, B. L. Sullivan, and C. L. Wood. 2021. The eBird/Clements checklist of Birds of the World: v2021. Downloaded from https://www.birds.cornell.edu/clementschecklist/download/ (Vínculo)
I've got a question about this swap, and the related one for the other subspecies in this newly circumscribed species (https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_changes/124235). Many, if not most observations for both of these taxa (lilianae and auropectoralis) are initially identified as Sturnella magna. Would it be worth atlasing and changing those identifications as well? The vast majority can be assigned based on locality, as there is basically no distributional overlap between the species.
Los desacuerdos no intencionados ocurren cuando un grupo padre (B) se adelgaza al cambiar un grupo hijo (E) a otra parte del árbol taxonómico, provocando que las Identificaciones existentes del grupo padre sean interpretados como desacuerdos con las Identificaciones existentes del grupo hijo cambiado.
Identification
La ID 2 del taxón E será un desacuerdo no intencionado con la ID 1 del taxón B después del intercambio de ancestros
Si el adelgazamiento del grupo padre provoca más de 10 desacuerdos no intencionados, deberías dividir el grupo padre después de intercambiar el grupo hijo para substituir las identificaciones existentes del grupo padre (B) con identificaciones con las que no esté en desacuerdo,
I've got a question about this swap, and the related one for the other subspecies in this newly circumscribed species (https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_changes/124235). Many, if not most observations for both of these taxa (lilianae and auropectoralis) are initially identified as Sturnella magna. Would it be worth atlasing and changing those identifications as well? The vast majority can be assigned based on locality, as there is basically no distributional overlap between the species.