Taxonomic Merge 138057
(Guardado el 18/01/2024)
|
|
combinado en |
|
Comentarios
. . . and at least one doublet taxon
(bispinosa present twice - one under genus, one under subgenus Saperdopsis)
Hi Boris! Thanks for pointing that out. I will try to go through and tidy everything up to align with the revision. I'm not sure why Saperdopsis and several of the other old genera are listed as subgenera... Cheers!
Agregar un comentario
Acceder
o Crear una cuenta
para agregar comentarios.
This produced several species names now not in same gender than genus . . .