Atención: Algunas o todas las identificaciones afectadas por
esta división puede haber sido reemplazada por identificaciones de 
Ceyx. Esto
ocurre cuando no podemos asignar automáticamente una identificación a uno de los
taxa de salida.
Revisar identificaciones de Ceyx erithaca 2623
Ceyx. Esto
ocurre cuando no podemos asignar automáticamente una identificación a uno de los
taxa de salida.
Revisar identificaciones de Ceyx erithaca 2623
Taxonomic Split 45743
(Guardado el 17/01/2020)
|
|
dividido en |
|
Comentarios
Still necessary, for similar reasons to the vireo. Please note that range for 850880 is wrong as excludes wintering range, but atlas is correct (erithaca also reaches Borneo, not stated in Clements). Have added an atlas for rufidorsa.
ok committed
Agregar un comentario
Acceder
o Crear una cuenta
para agregar comentarios.
@rjq and @maxkirsch - can you advise here. Is a retroactive split necessary here? I see that the range of Ceyx erithaca 2623 is wrong. But we can update the range (e.g. with the one on Ceyx erithaca 850880)
but a retroactive split would only be necessary to deal with obs ID'd as Ceyx erithaca 2623 what should have been split off as Ceyx rufidorsa 72646
Clements says Ceyx erithaca is "partially migratory, wintering to the southern Thai-Malay Peninsula and Sumatra" - so are those obs from there obs that should be split off as Ceyx rufidorsa, or are they just migratory Ceyx erithaca?
I guess I'm asking whether we need to split here or whether we can just let IDers sort out confusion between sympatric Ceyx erithaca and Ceyx rufidorsa south of the Isthmus of Kra?