@austinrkelly, we were in the middle of a discussion trying to work out whether these merited devations from POWO, when you rammed the taxon swaps through and marked our flag as 'resolved': https://www.inaturalist.org/flags/495230
Did you take the trouble to read the discussion? It comes accross as pretty rude for you to unilaterally make these changes in the middle of a discussion about them. There were hundreds of observations involved, I hope you volunteer to help re-identify them correctly should we decide to deviate from POWO, it won't be a small job.
Los desacuerdos no intencionados ocurren cuando un grupo padre (B) se adelgaza al cambiar un grupo hijo (E) a otra parte del árbol taxonómico, provocando que las Identificaciones existentes del grupo padre sean interpretados como desacuerdos con las Identificaciones existentes del grupo hijo cambiado.
Identification
La ID 2 del taxón E será un desacuerdo no intencionado con la ID 1 del taxón B después del intercambio de ancestros
Si el adelgazamiento del grupo padre provoca más de 10 desacuerdos no intencionados, deberías dividir el grupo padre después de intercambiar el grupo hijo para substituir las identificaciones existentes del grupo padre (B) con identificaciones con las que no esté en desacuerdo,
@austinrkelly, we were in the middle of a discussion trying to work out whether these merited devations from POWO, when you rammed the taxon swaps through and marked our flag as 'resolved': https://www.inaturalist.org/flags/495230
Did you take the trouble to read the discussion? It comes accross as pretty rude for you to unilaterally make these changes in the middle of a discussion about them. There were hundreds of observations involved, I hope you volunteer to help re-identify them correctly should we decide to deviate from POWO, it won't be a small job.