While I understand that this follows Index Fungorum/MycoBank, I'd suggest that making changes to Lepista/Clitocybe nuda and related species right now is an exercise in futility. This will result in a number of users having their observations labeled under an inactive taxon, when the reality is that there is (as far as I can tell) no global consensus about Lepista/Clitocybe, largely because the resolution of the nomenclatural issue will (painfully) have to include Collybia...
I'd recommend holding off on further changes to this group, mostly due to the latter issue, but also because there are a number of undescribed taxa (the Western North American species (plural?) is/are apparently different from the type).
Hi Christian, at least I have no intentions to make further changes here. If I remember correctly, both Clitocybe nuda and Lepista nuda were included as active in iNat's taxonomy, and I swapped one with the other based on the best sources I could find.
Los desacuerdos no intencionados ocurren cuando un grupo padre (B) se adelgaza al cambiar un grupo hijo (E) a otra parte del árbol taxonómico, provocando que las Identificaciones existentes del grupo padre sean interpretados como desacuerdos con las Identificaciones existentes del grupo hijo cambiado.
Identification
La ID 2 del taxón E será un desacuerdo no intencionado con la ID 1 del taxón B después del intercambio de ancestros
Si el adelgazamiento del grupo padre provoca más de 10 desacuerdos no intencionados, deberías dividir el grupo padre después de intercambiar el grupo hijo para substituir las identificaciones existentes del grupo padre (B) con identificaciones con las que no esté en desacuerdo,
While I understand that this follows Index Fungorum/MycoBank, I'd suggest that making changes to Lepista/Clitocybe nuda and related species right now is an exercise in futility. This will result in a number of users having their observations labeled under an inactive taxon, when the reality is that there is (as far as I can tell) no global consensus about Lepista/Clitocybe, largely because the resolution of the nomenclatural issue will (painfully) have to include Collybia...
I'd recommend holding off on further changes to this group, mostly due to the latter issue, but also because there are a number of undescribed taxa (the Western North American species (plural?) is/are apparently different from the type).